TheLeaflet
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Advisory Board
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Grievance Redressal Mechanism
    • Write For Us
    • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Advisory Board
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Grievance Redressal Mechanism
    • Write For Us
    • Careers
No Result
View All Result
TheLeaflet
No Result
View All Result
in Democracy and Rule of Law Judiciary Rule of Law

SCBA and BAI condemn police raids on Delhi riots case advocate Mehmood Pracha

The LeafletbyThe Leaflet
December 28, 2020
in Democracy and Rule of Law, Judiciary, Rule of Law
SCBA and BAI condemn police raids on Delhi riots case advocate Mehmood Pracha

Advocate Mehmood Pracha. Source: NDTV

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Bar Association of India (BAI) have condemned the police raids at the office of advocate Mehmood Pracha in connection with the Delhi riots case.

Pracha is representing some of the accused in the Delhi Riots case.

In a statement released on Monday, SCBA said a search and seizure conducted by the police at the premises of an advocate in a case not pertaining to or relating to a member of the Bar is a malicious act that defeats the rights of an advocate to practice his profession without fear or favour.

Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) condemns the police raid in the office of Advocate #MehmoodPracha. Says grant of a search warrant by the Magistrate to search a lawyer’s office in a routine mechanical manner is antithetical to rule of law. pic.twitter.com/bz04P7hC7c

— The Leaflet (@TheLeaflet_in) December 28, 2020

Such actions, the SCBA said, are intimidatory and designed to abuse the due process by coercing an advocate to succumb to police threats and methods unheard of in legal annals.

“The seizures of confidential information which is protected by lawyer-client privilege, in a search conducted by the very police authorities who are prosecuting the lawyer’s clients, will prejudicially affect the rights and guarantees of the accused. It is illegal and contravenes all cannons of protection to a client and his lawyer,” the statement read.

SCBA also questioned the grant of a search warrant by the Magistrate. It said to allow search in the premises of a lawyer in a routine mechanical manner, particularly in respect of a lawyer’s communication and correspondences, is antithetical to rule of law and constitutes a disturbing violation of this privilege directly affecting the administration of justice.

SCBA also condemned the “brutal assault” on a lawyer in Etah district of Uttar Pradesh in his house when he was with his family.

“It is a gross and calculated action on the part of the police in total contravention of law,” said SCBA.

SCBA has called upon all concerned authorities to take serious punitive action against all concerned for their atrocious conduct which denigrates and violates the mandate of the Rule of law.

In its statement, the Bar Association of India urged the authorities and judiciary to be cognizant of the importance of attorney-client privilege while issuing and executing search warrants that could erode this cornerstone of the administration of justice.

“The issuing of a search warrant in respect of a lawyer’s communication and correspondence is a grave violation of client-attorney privilege, and can cause a chilling effect in clients providing true and complete disclosures to their lawyers, and would impede the administration of justice”, the BAI said.

After the SCBA, the Bar Association of India also expresses its concern at the raids carried by the Delhi police in Adv Mehmood Pracha's office. Urges the authorities&judiciary to be cognizant of the importance of attorney-client privilege while issuing&executing search warrants. pic.twitter.com/C5mQEV5ZQQ

— The Leaflet (@TheLeaflet_in) December 28, 2020

Earlier, the Bar Council of Delhi wrote to the Union Home Minister expressing its displeasure at the raids in the premises of the duo advocates. It said the raid appeared to fall short of the statutory requirement of privileged communication between lawyer and client and that the Bar Council wasn’t taken into confidence before the raids.

Bar Council of Delhi writes to Union Home Minister. Says search at advocates #MehmoodPracha and Javed Ali’s offices appears to fall short of the statutory requirement of privileged communication between lawyer and client. Also says Bar Council wasn't taken into confidence. pic.twitter.com/9EIFq7hy97

— The Leaflet (@TheLeaflet_in) December 27, 2020

Meanwhile, a Delhi Court, on the application filed by Pracha, directed the preservation of the entire video footage of the police raids at the house of Advocate Mehmood Pracha.

The Delhi Police has also registered an FIR against Pracha where he and his associates have been accused of allegedly abusing and intimidating the police team that searched his office premises for 15 hours straight on 24 and 25 December.

Criticising the raids, senior advocate Indira Jaising tweeted:  “The raids on Mahmood Pracha, Lawyer for the defence in the Delhi riots case is a direct attack on the fundamental rights of the right to legal representation, all lawyers must condemn this attack.”

The raids on Mahmood Pracha Lawyer for the defence in the Delhi riots case is a direct attack on the fundamental right of the right to legal representation , all lawyers must condemn this attack

— Indira Jaising (@IJaising) December 24, 2020

Pracha is being investigated pursuant to a Delhi Court order asking the police to probe the allegations against him that he had “tutored” some victims and witnesses in the Delhi riots case to give “false statements”.

According to The Wire, the Delhi Police claimed in a report alleging that Pracha “tutored” victims to give false statements in riot-related cases. The report cited a victim’s statement, in which he said he was asked by Pracha to make a false deposition.

Tags: attorney-client relationshipBAIDelhi PoliceDelhi riotsjudiciaryLeaflet ReportsMehmood Prachapolice raidsprivilege communicationrule of lawSCBAsearch and seizureSlider Post

Related Posts

Is it a Judge who is Hon’ble or a Court?
Judiciary

Is it a Judge who is Hon’ble or a Court?

byJustice Yatindra Singh (Retd.)
Will Supreme Court Apply Rohingya Case Logic to CAA?
Human Rights

Will Supreme Court Apply Rohingya Case Logic to CAA?

byMihir Desai
Freedom of Speech

Bombay HC criticizes Goa police for FIR against musicians for hurting religious feelings based on vague complaint; quashes FIR

byThe Leaflet

Editor's Pick

Constitution Day: India Needs to Develop Scientific Temper, Spirit of Inquiry and Humanism

Why has Indian democracy been downgraded?

byAJIT SINGH

A Case for the Release of All Women Undertrial Prisoners

A Case for the Release of All Women Undertrial Prisoners

byPratiksha Baxiand1 others

WhatsApp Privacy Controversy and India’s Data Protection Bill

WhatsApp Privacy Controversy and India’s Data Protection Bill

byAkshat Bhushan

Acquittal in Ishrat Jahan Encounter: A Licence to Kill?

Acquittal in Ishrat Jahan Encounter: A Licence to Kill?

byParsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr

Latest by TheLeaflet

NHRC committee to investigate impact of COVID-19 on human rights; focus on marginalised and vulnerable sections

As India jostles with second COVID-19 wave, it must introduce minimum basic income programme

April 12, 2021
Is it a Judge who is Hon’ble or a Court?

Is it a Judge who is Hon’ble or a Court?

April 12, 2021
Gujarat HC takes suo motu cognisance of precarious health situation in state following COVID-19 spike; tells top officers to watch court proceedings

Gujarat HC takes suo motu cognisance of precarious health situation in state following COVID-19 spike; tells top officers to watch court proceedings

April 11, 2021
Will Supreme Court Apply Rohingya Case Logic to CAA?

Will Supreme Court Apply Rohingya Case Logic to CAA?

April 11, 2021

Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!

Follow Us

© 2020 TheLeaflet

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES
×

Subscribe to The Leaflet

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Leaflet and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Advisory Board
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Grievance Redressal Mechanism
    • Write For Us
    • Careers

© 2020 TheLeaflet