TheLeaflet
  • Home
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Write For Us
    • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Write For Us
    • Careers
No Result
View All Result
TheLeaflet
No Result
View All Result
in Miscellaneous

Draft EIA Notification 2020: Whose interests does it secure?

Sonali JainbySonali Jain
July 24, 2020
in Miscellaneous
Draft EIA Notification 2020: Whose interests does it secure?

The draft EIA notification has been strongly criticised by environmental and climate change activists across the country. Many campaigns, including by Fridays for Future, are encouraging the public to write to the Ministry to recognise its potentially devastating impact at a time when we should be focussing on conserving our natural systems. The author explains the implications of the EIA draft for the environment.

——-

 
What is Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) ? 
 
This is a question that needs to be answered as many just do not know. Even those who will be affected by numerous infrastructure projects that are in the pipeline do not know about it. It needs to be widely advertised so that people and stakeholders can voice their opinion and reservations. But in the midst of the pandemic is it going to be heard or even possible? It is ethically wrong for the government to make monumental changes that will impact the lives of the people during the pandemic. The country is worried about their health and security and this crisis should not be used as a distraction by the government to make such life altering decisions.
 
The EIA is an important regulation that prevents industrial and infrastructure projects from being approved or cleared without following the required safeguards. It looks at the potential impact that an industry would have at the environment and then a panel of experts would either grant or deny the clearance.
 
What are the drawbacks of the new Draft EIA 2020?
 
The new draft EIA Notification proposed by the Union government recently is a regressive departure from the 2006 EIA and would supersede it.
 
The objective of the draft is to be environmentally friendly but instead it is pro-industry and anti-people. This notification would cause a landmark shift in the way clearances are obtained in the country.
 
Firstly, it does away with the requirement of public consultation for a wide range of projects.
 
It takes away the voice of affected communities by exempting projects like irrigation, widening of national highways, ropeways, building constructions and so on from public participation. It also reduces the time allotted to public participation to expedite the process.
 
Industries are required to submit compliance reports twice a year which is now reduced to once a year. This proves to be a pro-industry clause that reduces the check on industries and their impact on our environment.
 
It is a pure dilution of the monitoring system.
 
One of the major loopholes of the draft notification is the transparent lifeline thrown to industries that allow them to benefit from their violations.  It basically allows for post-facto clearances which would legitimise projects that have not received proper clearances and approvals.
 
This principle is against the fundamental structure of environmental law and also derogates from an order of the National Green Tribunal.
 
For instance,  Dehing Patkai known as the Amazon of the East in Assam has been ravaged by illegal coal mining for several years by Coal India . The mining was done with clearances since 2013. It continues to do so and have still been granted a conditional clearance due to post facto approvals. This is deeply problematic as no one should benefit from their violations.
 

Illustration by Kripa Hebbar

 
How does it affect local communities and on ground workers? 
 
It is important to note that even though it is a national legislation, it was only published in Hindi and English and not in any other vernacular languages. The Delhi High Court did order for translated copies of the draft in other scheduled languages which has not been done yet. This clearly excludes local communities from public participation as they can’t file objections against something if they cannot understand it.
 
What can you do as a public against the notification? 
 
It is important to note that by virtue of Article 21 it is our constitutional right to be a part of the democratic decision making process.
 
The Delhi High court has clarified that the last day to send in objections to this draft notification is August 11th 2020 . These objections will then be considered by the Union Government before passing the notification.
 
We are in the midst of a health and climate emergency and this draft notification EIA 2020 proposes a significant change in the structure of environmental law and process in the country.
 
The authorities have also taken down websites of three national environmental advocacy groups that launched digital campaigns and open letter movements against the notification. The collectives are Fridays For Future, Let India Breathe and There Is No Earth B. This is a transparent attempt at web censorship to silence the voices of youngsters and activists protesting against the draft.These websites were taken down without prior notice or reasonable expectation during the peak time of awareness and campaigning. It is a blatant violation of our freedom of speech and expression. This is also an indication that the authorities are scared of our voices and when they do try to silence it ,we should only raise our voices louder.
 
We must be made privy to information on a policy that defines our future and we must be allowed to be a part of the democratic decision making process.
 

(The author is a 5th year student at the School Of Excellence In Law, Chennai.  Views are personal.)

 
UPDATE: Delhi police has withdrawn the charges against Fridays For Future and others. However their websites still remain down.)
 

Tags: EIA 2020environmental clearanceenvironmental impact assessmentFridays for Futureinfrastructure projectslocal communitiesMinistry of Environment Forest and Climate Change

Related Posts

SC quashes Gujarat govt’s notifications increasing work hours without paying overtime wages
Case update

Persistent sullying of spouse’s character among colleagues, superiors amounts to mental cruelty justifying grant of divorce: SC

byThe Leaflet
Social Activist Anjali Bhardwaj among 12 Anti-Corruption Champions recognised by US
Miscellaneous

Social Activist Anjali Bhardwaj among 12 Anti-Corruption Champions recognised by US

bySaikeerthi
Varavara Rao to remain in Nanavati hospital; Bombay HC to hear ailing poet’s bail plea on Jan 7
Right to Life

Varavara Rao granted six-month bail on medical grounds; court would’ve abdicated its duty of protecting poet’s rights if bail not granted, says Bombay HC

byThe Leaflet

Editor's Pick

New Media Rules: An Over The Top Distraction?

New Media Rules: An Over The Top Distraction?

byVickram Crishna

Bakerwals Await Grazing Rights in Ladakh After Forest Rights Act Applied to J&K

Bakerwals Await Grazing Rights in Ladakh After Forest Rights Act Applied to J&K

byRaja Muzaffar Bhat

Does Latest Indo-Pak Ceasefire Arrangement Signal Lasting Peace?

Does Latest Indo-Pak Ceasefire Arrangement Signal Lasting Peace?

byPratik Patnaik

15th Finance Commission recommendations favour neo-liberal fiscal centralisation that may affect states

15th Finance Commission recommendations favour neo-liberal fiscal centralisation that may affect states

byDr. C. P. Chandrashekhar

Latest by TheLeaflet

Jawaharlal Nehru: An Iron-willed Democrat Who Had Strength Lined with Tenderness

Jawaharlal Nehru: An Iron-willed Democrat Who Had Strength Lined with Tenderness

March 2, 2021
UP Govt received two NHRC notice about serious crimes against teenage girls

NHRC Statement on Moradabad Gang Rape Case, Demands Compliance Report from UP Government

March 1, 2021
Former CJ Madras HC to be Director of National Judicial Academy

Former CJ Madras HC to be Director of National Judicial Academy

March 1, 2021
Delhi HC quashes criminal defamation case against Business Standard, journalist Mitali Saran for piece about RSS

Delhi HC quashes criminal defamation case against Business Standard, journalist Mitali Saran for piece about RSS

March 1, 2021

Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!

Follow Us

© 2020 TheLeaflet

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES
×

Subscribe to The Leaflet

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Leaflet and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Home
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • Culture
    • Book Review
    • Movie Review
    • Poetry
  • Humour
  • Issues
    • Analysis
    • Case update
    • Child’s Rights
    • Civil Law
    • Coronavirus and the Law
    • Criminal Justice System
    • Criminal Law
    • Dalit Rights
    • Editor’s Desk
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fundamental Rights
    • Gender Rights
    • Governance
    • Health Rights
    • History
    • International Law
    • Judiciary
    • Juvenile Justice
    • Know Your Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law and Technology
    • Litigation
    • Mental Health
    • Policy
    • Politics
    • Right To Informtion
    • Sexual Offences
    • Social Justice
  • Leaflet Specials
    • Independence Day Special
    • Independence of judiciary
    • Republic Day Special on Citizenship
    • Right to Privacy
    • Special Issue: Emergency
    • The Leaflet Specials- Year 2020
    • The legacy of Ruth Ginsburg
    • Triple Talaq
    • Two years since Navtej Johar case
  • Videos
  • Historical Series
  • Contact us
    • Write For Us
    • Careers

© 2020 TheLeaflet